Federal Actions for Efficient Transportation
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TDM
Encyclopedia
Victoria Transport Policy Institute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Updated
June 20, 2007
This chapter identifies TDM policies and programs suitable for implementation by federal governments.
Federal governments significantly influence transportation and land use decisions in many ways. They finance and plan major transportation facilities and services, and establish long-term, strategic transportation plans and policies.
Federal governments are responsible for interregional
transportation and for non-transportation planning objectives such as public
health, economic development and environmental quality. Federal governments can
create Sustainable
Transportation plans and policies. When viewed from this broad
perspective, TDM programs often turn out to be more cost effective and
beneficial than alternative solutions to transportation problems.
Federal policies can have large leverage effects. For example, a few million dollars in federal funding can influence tens of millions of dollars in state and regional funding, which influences hundreds of millions of dollars in land use development and consumer expenditures. If federal policies favor highway improvements they can stimulate automobile-oriented transport systems and sprawled land use patterns, but federal funding for alternative modes can create more multi-modal transport systems and more compact land use development patterns.
Federal governments can support TDM implementation in the following ways:
The following strategies are particularly suitable for implementation by federal governments. For more detailed information see the TDM Summary Table.
Various management
strategies can increase air transport efficiency, including strategies that
encourage use of alternative modes, reduce total air traffic, increase air
travel system efficiencies, and reduce specific aviation external costs such as
air and noise pollution.
Change Management
involves various techniques that help build support for innovation within
organizations.
Transportation price
and market reforms can encourage more efficient transportation and support TDM
objectives.
Comprehensive
Transport Planning
Various planning
reforms can result in more comprehensive and accurate transportation
decision-making. Current planning results in omissions and distortions that
tend to overvalue automobile-oriented improvements and undervalue alternative
solutions to transportation problems. More comprehensive planning is
particularly important when evaluating TDM and alternative modes.
Flexible design
requirements to reflect community values.
Planning that deals
with uncertainly by identifying solutions to potential future problems.
Freight
Transportation Management
Freight Transport
Management increases freight transportation efficiency by shifting improving
the quality of efficient freight modes (such as rail and integrated
distribution services), providing incentives to use the most efficient option
for each type of delivery, increasing load factors, improving logistics, and
reducing unnecessary shipping distances and volumes.
Fuel taxes can be raised to increase roadway user fees and cost recovery,
reduce vehicle travel, conserve energy and reduce pollution emissions.
There are various
ways to fund transport programs, some of which support TDM objectives by
charging directly for vehicle use.
High Occupant
Vehicle (HOV) priority strategies give priority to public transit vehicles,
vanpools and carpools in traffic and parking.
Institutional reforms
include various changes to transportation organizations’ policies and practices
that support Transportation Demand Management.
Least Cost Planning
refers to planning and investment reforms that support demand management
implementation when overall cost effective. This tends to support TDM policies
and programs.
Improved operations
and management can encourage more efficient use of existing roadways.
Improved pricing
methods can reduce the transaction costs and increase the cost efficiency of
road tolls, parking fees and mileage charges.
Road pricing means that motoristspay directly for driving on a particular
roadway or in a particular area. “Congestion pricing” (also called “value
pricing”) refers to variable
tolls, with higher prices under congested conditions and lower prices under
less congested conditions, intended to reduce peak-period traffic volumes to
optimal levels.
Smart Growth involves various local and regional land use planning practices that create more
accessible, multi-modal, efficient and livable communities. This tends to
reduce driving and increase use of alternative modes.
Various planning,
regulatory and fiscal reforms help create more efficient land use. These
reforms can help correct existing practices that encourage automobile-dependent
land use development patterns.
TDM can help achieve
sustainable transport planning objectives.
TDM
Planning and Implementation
Discusses various
issues to consider when planning and implementing Transportation Demand
Management programs.
There are many ways to improve public transit service quality, including
increased service speed, frequency, convenience, comfort, user information,
affordability and ease of access.
Transportation
Model Improvements
Transportation
models can be improved to increase their accuracy when comparing modes and
evaluating TDM strategies. Current models tend to undervalue TDM strategies.
Win-Win
Transportation Solutions
Win-Win
Transportation Solutions are various TDM strategies that provide a combination
of economic, social and environmental benefits.
The Canadian Federal House In Order (FHIO) website provides information on several successful Commute Trip Reduction programs, as summarized in the table below. Each description includes information on the program’s tools, background, target audience, program description, main components, communications, resources required, results, lessons learned, resources and transferability.
Table 4 Canadian Commute Trip Reduction Programs
|
|
Public Transit |
Bike/Walk |
Carpool/ Vanpool |
Business Travel |
Telework |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
A comprehensive study of
European TDM programs found that European planners tend to use more
comprehensive strategies to influence travelers before they get into their cars
(promoting nonmotorized modes and alternative destinations of travel) and
provide improved options for drivers who choose to use the road system (faster
routes and more reliable travel times).
A variety of management
systems are used to manage travel demand and traffic. Pretrip traveler
information systems are clearly designed to encourage more efficient travel by
suggesting routes and times of the day that are less congested and offer more
reliable travel times. Pretrip information can also influence the mode selected
(e.g., public transport or carpooling) or even the destination of travel
(whether to work from home or shop closer to home). In addition, near-trip and
even on-trip (en route) information can influence time, route, mode, and
destination choice. For example, commuters can be provided with real-time
information on travel times to their work location if they continue to drive or
shift to a nearby park-and-ride service. Road pricing can clearly affect mode,
time, and route choice, and even influence lane choice, as is the case with
high occupancy toll (HOT) lanes in the
In the center of the
management systems is the transportation management center (TMC), which both
manages facilities and provides information to travelers. Traditional
transportation demand management (TDM), such as rideshare matching, promotion
of alternative modes, and vanpool provision, typically works at the other end
of the framework to influence mode and destination choice based on the need to
travel, but it can also be an integral part of the information systems linked
to the TMC. This comprehensive approach provides a new way of looking at the
need for and management of transport and traffic demand.
These programs are designed
not just to reduce traffic congestion, they are intended to create more
livable, sustainable cities by creating and implementing integrated packages of
transportation measures that combined improved alternatives to driving a car;
real-time information on traffic conditions; options providing pretrip,
near-trip, and on-trip route information; new partnerships to support these
enhanced travel choices; and even pricing to reduce the number of cars entering
the city centers or on the entire network during congestion periods. Planners
are doing so by integrating demand management into both their long-range transportation
plans and shorter range operating policies. They are carefully monitoring the
performance of the system by looking not only at mobility but also at measures
such as accessibility, air quality, and livability.
Total
truck volumes actually increased on many cross-Alpine routes when the HVF was
implemented because maximum vehicle weights were increased from 28 tonnes to
34-tonnes at the same time. Environmental groups are lobbying to increase HVF
rates and improve rail service, as demand management strategies to reduce total
truck traffic.
The U.S. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has
developed an interactive website/database that includes dozens of examples of
successful innovative programs that have increased ridership. These include
improvements in service, fare collection, marketing, vehicles, coordination
with other organizations, intermodal activities, operator training, and security.
Detailed descriptions are provided for each program, including the type of
program, size of service area, and impact on ridership.
ACT (2004), The Role Of Demand-Side Strategies: Mitigating Traffic Congestion, Association for Commuter Transportation, for the Federal Highway Administration (http://tmi.cob.fsu.edu/act/FHWA_Cong_Mitigation_11%202%2004.pdf).
Edward Beimborn and Robert Puentes (2003), Highways and Transit: Leveling the Playing Field in Federal Transportation Policy, Brookings Institute (www.brookings.edu).
Best Practices & Local Leadership Programme (www.bestpractices.org)
United Nations Human Settlements Programme(UN-HABITAT)
Best Workplaces for Commuters (www.bwc.gov) is a program sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Transportation to recognize employers that provide outstanding commuter benefits. The website has a variety of resources concerning various Commute Trip Reduction strategies, including the TDM Case Studies Spreadsheet (www.cities21.org/epaModeShiftCaseStudies.xls)
Benoît Bosquet (2000), “Environmental Tax Reform: Does It Work? - A Survey of the Empirical Evidence,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 34, 19-32.
Sally
CALTRANS (2004), California Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Searchable Database, California Department of Transportation (http://transitorienteddevelopment.dot.ca.gov).
CCAP (2005), Transportation Emissions Guidebook: Land Use, Transit &
Travel Demand Management, Center for Clean
Air Policy (www.ccap.org/trans.htm).
This guidebook helps users assess the air pollution,
energy use, and greenhouse gas emissions benefits of a variety of
transportation and land use policies. Includes policy overviews, success
stories and links to key models and resources.
Centre for Sustainable Community Development: Case Studies (www.fcm.ca/scep/index.htm), Federation of Canadian Municipalities (www.fcm.ca).
Clean Air Initiative (www.worldbank.org/cleanair) and the Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities (www.worldbank.org/wbi/cleanair/caiasia ) provide information on innovative programs that improve air quality in developing countries.
COST, Best Practice For Sustainable Urban Infrastructures, COST Program (www.cf.ac.uk/archi/research/cost8).
Alan Durning and Yoram Bauman (1998), Tax Shift, Northwest Environment Watch (www.northwestwatch.org).
ECMT
(2000), Efficient
Transport Taxes and Charges, European Conference of Ministers of Transport,
OECD (www.sourceoecd.org).
EEA
(2004), Transport Price
Signals: Monitoring Changes in European Transport Prices and Charging Policy in
the Framework of TERM, Transport and Environment Reporting Mechanism (TERM), European
Environment Agency; Technical Report No 3/2004
(http://reports.eea.eu.int/technical_report_2004_3/en/Technical_report_3-2004_web.pdf).
ELTIS Case Study Database (www.eltis.org/en/indexcse.htm)
European Local Transport Information Service.
EPI (2002), Selected Examples of Explicit Environmental Tax Reform Packages, Earth Policy Institute (www.earth-policy.org/Updates/Update14_data.htm).
European Transport Pricing Initiatives (www.transport-pricing.ne) includes various efforts to develop more fair and efficient pricing. Specific European transportation pricing projects are described below:
AFFORD (www.vatt.fi/afford) is an evaluation of optimal transportation pricing policies.
CORDIS Project - Transport (www.cordis.lu/cost-transport/src/cost-342.htm) is a major European study of best practice in pricing and land use management policies to improve mobility and address energy and emission problems.
CUPID (Co-ordinating Urban Pricing Integrated Demonstrations), European Transport Pricing Initiative, Project No. GRD1-1999-10958, European Commission, Competitive and Sustainable Growth Programme (www.transport-pricing.net/reports22.html), November, 2001.
ExternE (http://externe.jrc.es) involves research into external costs of transport.
IMPRINT (www.imprint-eu.org) is an effort to promote implementation of fair and efficient transport pricing.
PETS (www.cordis.lu/transport/src/pets.htm) assesses current pricing of transport modes in European Union member countries.
TRACE (www.hcg.nl/projects/trace/trace1.htm) provides costs of private road travel and their effects on demand, including short and long term elasticities. Sponsored by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Transport.
SPRUCTRUM (www.its.leeds.ac.uk/projects/spectrum) (Study of Policies regarding Economic instruments Complementing Transport Regulation and the Undertaking of physical Measures) is a research program to develop a framework for evaluating economic instruments, regulatory and physical measures to help achieve transport efficiency and equity objectives.
TRENEN (www.cordis.lu/transport/src/trenen.htm) is an effort to develop models for transport, environment and energy.
UNITE (www.its.leeds.ac.uk/projects/unite) involves transport cost accounting.
European Program for Mobility Management Examples (www.epommweb.org/examples/examples.html) describes various European transportation demand management programs.
FHWA (2006), Managing Travel Demand: Applying European
Perspectives to
Joel Hirschhorn
(2000), In the Fast Lane: Delivering
More Transportation Choices to Break Gridlock, National Governor’s Association, Center for
Best Practices (www.nga.org), Nov. 2000.
IISD, Sustainable Development Gateway, International Institute for Sustainable Development (www.sdgateway.net/topics/111.htm) contains case studies and other resources developed by members of the Sustainable Development Communications Network (SDCN). Transportation studies, case studies, assessments, colloquia, etc. 21 titles link to the relevant sites. Covering over 50 topics, the SD Topics section includes links to more than 1,200 documents: www.sdgateway.net/topics/default.htm
Institute for Transportation Development Policy (ITDP) (www.itdp.org/tra/tra_5/index.html) promotes sustainable and equitable transportation policies and projects worldwide.
International Network for Urban Development (INTA) (www.inta-aivn.org/99-menus/ContentFrameSet10.htm) is an international network promoting urban development best practices exchange.
Doug Koplow and John Dernbach (2001), Federal Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Case Study of Increasing Transparency for Fiscal Policy, Annual Review of Energy and Environment, Vol. 26 (www.annualreviews.org), pp. 361-89.
MTE, Online Best Practices Database and Case Studies Database, Moving On the Economy (www.movingtheeconomy.ca) is an ever-expanding searchable inventory of sustainable transportation economic success stories.
NALGEP (2005), Clean Communities on the Move: A Partnership-Driven Approach to Clean Air and Smart Transportation, National Association of Local Government Environmental Professionals (NALGEP), (www.nalgep.org).
OECD (2000), Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST) Best Practice Competition, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (www1.oecd.org/env/ccst/est/curract/vienna2000/EST-Best-Practices-Synthesis-Report-Part2.pdf). Includes 18 transportation best practices case studies.
OECD (2001), Database on Environmentally Related Taxes, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (www1.oecd.org/env/policies/taxes/index.htm).
OUM (2001), TDM Success Stories, Office of Urban Mobility, Washington State Department of Transportation (www.wsdot.wa.gov/mobility/TDM/TDMsuccess.html).
Robert Puentes and Ryan Prince (2003), Fueling Transportation Finance: A Primer on the Gas Tax, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Brookings Institute (www.brookings.edu/es/urban).
RAND Europe (2005), Analysis and Assessment of Policies: Report on Performance of Policies, European Commission (www.summa-eu.org).
Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe (REC) has 4 urban transportation success stories, summarized and referenced, at www.rec.org/REC/Programs/SustainableCities/Transportation.html and 2 car use reduction successes, summarized and referenced, at www.rec.org/REC/Programs/SustainableCities/Land.html
Stephen Potter and Tom Rye (2000), The Potential for Further Changes to the Personal Taxation Regime to Encourage Modal Shift, Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (www.dtlr.gov.uk/itwp/modalshift/index.htm).
Jan A. Schwaab and Sascha Thielmann (2001), Economic Instruments for Sustainable Road Transport. An overview for Policy Makers in Developing Countries, GTZ (www.gtz.de) and the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (www.unescap.org); at www.gtz.de/dokumente/Economic_Instruments_for_Sustainable_Road_Transport.pdf.
SMILE - Sustainable Urban Transport Policies and
Initiatives (www.smile-europe.org/frame22.html).
170 successful and replicable European practices for sustainable mobility.
Strategic Policy Options for Sustainable Development Database (www.iges.or.jp/cgi-bin/rispo/index_spo.cgi), Research on Innovative and Strategic Policy Options (RISPO) by the Institute for Global Environmental Studies provides information, recommended best practices and case studies on a wide range of sustainable policies and strategies.
Sustainable
Development Online (http://sd-online.ewindows.eu.org)
has information on sustainable development programs throughout the world.
TC, Moving On Sustainable Transportation (MOST),
Transport
TELLUS - Bringing CIVITAS Onto the Road (www.tellus-cities.net), European Union. Describes projects to demonstrate that integrated urban transport policies can help reduce urban traffic problems.
Transport Research Knowledge Centre (http://ec.europa.eu/transport/extra/web/index.cfm) provides information on European transport research programmes that support sustainable mobility.
Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) Database (www.tc.gc.ca/programs/environment/UTSP/tdm.htm)
by Transport
UN-HABITAT, Best Practices & Local Leadership Programme United Nations Human Settlements Programme (www.bestpractices.org). Contains 1,100 demonstrated projects from 120 countries recognized by the Best Practices & Local Leadership Programme (BLP) for addressing common social, economic and environmental problems of an urbanizing world.
USEPA (2001), Directory of Air Quality Economic Incentive Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (http://yosemite.epa.gov/aa/programs.nsf).
USEPA, Voluntary Emission Reduction Policies and Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (www.epa.gov/oms/transp/traqvolm.htm). This website describes the successful implementation of various voluntary mobile source reduction measures.
USEPA (2002), Transportation Control Measures Program Information Directory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (http://yosemite.epa.gov/aa/tcmsitei.nsf). This is an on-line searchable database with approximately 120 case studies of programs that reduce transportation pollution emissions.
USEPA (2002), Smart Moves: Transportation and Smart Growth Best Practices (www.epa.gov/livability/smart_moves.htm) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This competition profiles state and local efforts to promote smart growth principles in transportation projects.
USEPA, Gateway to International Best Practices and
Innovations,
WBCSD,
Sustainable Mobility Project,
World Business Council on Sustainable Development (www.wbcsdmobility.org/mobility_web/index.asp)
includes 200 mobility case studies with
brief descriptions and internet links.
WHO (2004), Case Studies On Sustainable Development, World Health Organization (www.who.dk/eprise/main/WHO/Progs/HCP/Documentation/20010917_2)
World Bank, Urban Transport Group Case Studies, World Bank (www.worldbank.org/transport/urbtrans/pubtrans.htm) includes information on projects in the developing world, with summaries/abstracts and full texts.
This
Encyclopedia is produced by the Victoria Transport Policy Institute to help
improve understanding of Transportation Demand Management. It is an ongoing
project. Please send us your comments and suggestions for improvement.
www.vtpi.org info@vtpi.org
Phone
& Fax 250-360-1560
#207